20100910, 02:30  #1  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2^{2}·2,503 Posts 
Newer milestone thread
For all of you countdown junkies:
Quote:
It just seemed that the old millstone thread was a bit long. Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20100910 at 02:31 Reason: apologies to philmoore 

20100910, 17:11  #2  
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts 
Quote:
posts. The milestone I would like to monitor is the countdown to the status of exponents below (say) 55M not being unknown. David PS The LL wavefront is struggling to reach 51M. Last fiddled with by davieddy on 20100910 at 17:13 

20100911, 06:06  #3 
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
393_{16} Posts 

20100919, 14:11  #4  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10011100011100_{2} Posts 
_{.}
Quote:


20100920, 06:46  #5  
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
1720_{16} Posts 
Quote:
I will also start counting down first time LLs less than 30M. There are currently 59. I will make an updated spreadsheet next time I post. 

20100920, 21:31  #6  
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts 
Quote:
My enthusiasm for following this would be increased if you could find out why anyone is testing the 6 below 21M or why the 200 or so below 37M are described as first time tests. This is readily available on the primenet summary page. @ UncWilly: this is all there on the milestones page. As I've said before, the interest is to be derived from the rate of change of the countdowns. Since this is more or less exactly the same for M42 to M47, there is a sort of redundancy generated by the freakish number of primes discovered in the last few years. FWIW countdown to proving M42 is M42 was 41,605 on 29th July. David PS I don't think "milestones" were placed by the roadside randomly. Last fiddled with by davieddy on 20100920 at 21:38 

20100922, 05:54  #7 
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany
1022_{8} Posts 
September 21, 2010: The trial factoring wavefront hits 77M.

20100926, 08:00  #8  
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
13440_{8} Posts 
Quote:
LLs less than 30M is increasing somehow so I won't continue recording that. Regression line still says mid 2012. 

20100927, 13:44  #9 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
1494_{10} Posts 
No, there remain less than that to be tested.
Actually, at the time of writing these lines, there are 35 exponents less than 22M remaining to be DCed. You were counting the assigned ones. And there are no first time LLs remaining under 30M. The ones assigned will be finished (or not...) as DChecks. 
20101011, 17:53  #10 
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2^{5}·5·37 Posts 

20101011, 18:20  #11  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2^{2}·2,503 Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Newer X64 build needed  Googulator  Msieve  73  20200830 07:47 
Performance of cudaecm on newer hardware?  fivemack  GMPECM  14  20150212 20:10 
Cause this don't belong in the milestone thread  bcp19  Data  30  20120908 15:09 
Newer msieves are slow on Core i7  mklasson  Msieve  9  20090218 12:58 
Use of large memory pages possible with newer linux kernels  Dresdenboy  Software  3  20031208 14:47 